4.5 Article

Particulate matter emissions from flex-fuel vehicles with direct fuel injection

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

TURKISH NATL COMMITTEE AIR POLLUTION RES & CONTROL-TUNCAP
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2021.101078

关键词

Vehicular emissions; Particulate matter; GDI; Ethanol; Flex fuel; Multivariate statistics

资金

  1. Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology
  2. CNPq [312.615/20183]
  3. FAPERJ
  4. National Agency for Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels - ANP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of varying ethanol-gasoline blends in GDI vehicles affects particulate matter emissions, with the quality and composition of emissions being dependent on the type of fuel used.
Otto cycle vehicles with gasoline direct injection (GDI) can reduce fuel consumption by 5-20%. In compliance with current legislation in Brazil, this technology was introduced to the domestic market in the form of a first flex-fuel GDI vehicle in 2013. However, despite gains in efficiency, studies in the literature have shown that GDI engines tend to have higher particulate matter emissions than port fuel injection (PFI) engines. This paper provides measurements of the emissions of GDI flex-fuel vehicles fuelled with gasoline containing 22% anhydrous ethanol (E22), hydrous ethanol (E100) and a 50% mixture of both (E61). The blending fuels were tested in accordance with the recommendations made in the widely known FTP 75 and HWFET cycles. The particulatematter emissions formed during the combustion process were closely linked to fuel-type properties. The results showed the particles that adhere to sampling filters have higher concentrations of fluorine and carbon and lower amounts of silicon and oxygen, as well as sizes of around 2 mu m. The black carbon emissions tend to increase directly with the gasoline content in the fuel. The results also provided evidence that the HWFET test cycle showed a higher emission rate of total particulate matter than the FTP 75 test cycle, and that overall, there were higher emissions for E22 than E100.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据