4.7 Article

LyGo: A Platform for Rapid Screening of Lytic Polysaccharide Monooxygenase Production

期刊

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 897-906

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.1c00034

关键词

protein production; expression vector; cloning; lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase; LPMO

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF17SA0027704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) are crucial enzymes for breaking down biomass, and efficient production of LPMOs is essential for industrial processes. To optimize strategies for producing LPMOs, a standardized platform has been developed that allows rapid exploration of various gene contexts, hosts, and expression strategies simultaneously.
Environmentally friendly sources of energy and chemicals are essential constituents of a sustainable society. An important step toward this goal is the utilization of biomass to supply building blocks for future biorefineries. Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) are enzymes that play a critical role in breaking the chemical bonds in the most abundant polymers found in recalcitrant biomass, such as cellulose and chitin. To use them in industrial processes they need to be produced in high titers in cell factories. Predicting optimal strategies for producing LPMOs is often nontrivial, and methods allowing for screening several strategies simultaneously are therefore needed. Here, we present a standardized platform for cloning LPMOs. The platform allows users to combine gene fragments with 14 different expression vectors in a simple 15 min reaction, thus enabling rapid exploration of several gene contexts, hosts, and expression strategies in parallel. The open-source LyGo platform is accompanied by easy-to-follow online protocols for both cloning and expression. As a demonstration of its utility, we explore different strategies for expressing several different LPMOs in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Komagataella phaffii.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据