4.7 Article

Biobased Nonisocyanate Polyurethanes as Recyclable and Intrinsic Self-Healing Coating with Triple Healing Sites

期刊

ACS MACRO LETTERS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 635-641

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00163

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)
  2. Science and Engineering Research Council of A*STAR, Singapore [A1786A0027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the development of bio-/CO2-derived nonisocyanate polyurethane (NIPU) coatings, which have high levels of renewable carbon and self-healing properties through three different healing mechanisms: thermo-healing, moisture-healing, and self-healing at room temperature. The coatings feature a unique combination of recyclability and intrinsic healing capabilities, making them ideal for sustainable and functional applications.
Polymer coatings having high amounts of renewable carbon and self-healing properties are highly sought after in a sustainability perspective. We report here the development of bio-/CO2-derived nonisocyanate polyurethane (NIPU) coatings which are recyclable and healable via three different types of healing mechanisms. These NIPUs contain furan rings in their main chain which after cross-linking with bismaleimides form organogels having a thermo-reversible sol-gel transition and solvent-borne coatings with improved properties. Judicial selection of the bismaleimide cross-linker structure enabled us to produce recyclable and intrinsic healable coatings mediated by heat (thermo-healing), moisture (moisture-healing), and, more interestingly, dry conditions at room temperature (self-healing). The intrinsic moisture-healing property of NIPU-based coatings is unprecedented and is mainly due to the presence of hydroxyl functionalities in the NIPU structure. The uniqueness of these cross-linked biobased NIPU as recyclable coatings having triple healing sites present in their structure gives these materials potential for sustainable and functional applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据