4.7 Article

Distribution of adenylyl cyclase/cAMP phosphodiesterase gene, CAPE, in streptophytes reproducing via motile sperm

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89539-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [18K06298, 21K06236]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K06298, 21K06236] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel adenylyl cyclase/cAMP phosphodiesterase gene named CAPE was isolated from liverworts and gymnosperms. The distribution of CAPE in plants reproducing via motile sperm corresponded to evolutionary history, suggesting its potential involvement in sexual reproduction process using motile sperm in streptophytes.
We recently isolated a novel adenylyl cyclase/cAMP phosphodiesterase gene from the liverwort, Marchantia polymorpha. The protein encoded by this gene has a class III adenylyl cyclase (AC) in the C-terminal domain and class I phosphodiesterase (PDE) in the N-terminal domain; therefore, we named it CAPE (COMBINED AC with PDE). CAPE protein is likely involved in spermatogenesis and sperm motility due to its tissue-specific expression pattern in M. polymorpha and the distribution of CAPE genes in streptophytes. However, little is known about the distribution of CAPE in gymnosperms that use motile sperm for fertilization, such as cycads and ginkgo. The present study aimed to isolate CAPE genes from the cycad, Cycas revoluta, the ginkgo, Ginkgo biloba, and the hornwort, Anthoceros agerestis. Sequences with high homology to CAPE were obtained from these species. Our analyses revealed that all plant taxonomic groups reproducing via motile sperm possessed CAPE, whereas those that do not produce motile sperm did not possess CAPE, with one exception in gymnosperm Cupressales. The phylogenic distribution of CAPE almost corresponds to the evolutionary history of motile sperm production and further suggests that CAPE may be involved in sexual reproduction process using motile sperm in streptophytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据