4.7 Article

QUBO formulations for training machine learning models

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89461-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  3. DOE Office of Science, High-energy Physics Quantised program
  4. DOE Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Training machine learning models on classical computers is time and compute intensive, while leveraging quantum computing, particularly adiabatic quantum computers, may offer faster solutions. By formulating machine learning problems as QUBO problems for adiabatic quantum computers, efficiency gains can be achieved. The computational complexities of these formulations are shown to be better or equivalent to classical approaches.
Training machine learning models on classical computers is usually a time and compute intensive process. With Moore's law nearing its inevitable end and an ever-increasing demand for large-scale data analysis using machine learning, we must leverage non-conventional computing paradigms like quantum computing to train machine learning models efficiently. Adiabatic quantum computers can approximately solve NP-hard problems, such as the quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO), faster than classical computers. Since many machine learning problems are also NP-hard, we believe adiabatic quantum computers might be instrumental in training machine learning models efficiently in the post Moore's law era. In order to solve problems on adiabatic quantum computers, they must be formulated as QUBO problems, which is very challenging. In this paper, we formulate the training problems of three machine learning models-linear regression, support vector machine (SVM) and balanced k-means clustering-as QUBO problems, making them conducive to be trained on adiabatic quantum computers. We also analyze the computational complexities of our formulations and compare them to corresponding state-of-the-art classical approaches. We show that the time and space complexities of our formulations are better (in case of SVM and balanced k-means clustering) or equivalent (in case of linear regression) to their classical counterparts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据