4.7 Article

Serial dependence and representational momentum in single-trial perceptual decisions

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89432-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P1_157420, PZ00P1_179988]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P1_179988, PP00P1_157420] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human brain has evolved to predict and anticipate environmental events from their temporal dynamics, influencing perception and decision-making processes. Perceptual decisions are influenced by both past and future states of sensory signals, with decisional serial dependence and representational momentum playing roles in these processes. The independent binding of stimuli and decisions over time is supported by the coexistence of these two phenomena.
The human brain has evolved to predict and anticipate environmental events from their temporal dynamics. Predictions can bias perception toward the recent past, particularly when the environment contains no foreseeable changes, but can also push perception toward future states of sensory input, like when anticipating the trajectory of moving objects. Here, we show that perceptual decisions are simultaneously influenced by both past and future states of sensory signals. Using an orientation adjustment task, we demonstrate that single-trial errors are displaced toward previous features of behaviorally relevant stimuli and, at the same time, toward future states of dynamic sensory signals. These opposing tendencies, consistent with decisional serial dependence and representational momentum, involve different types of processing: serial dependence occurs beyond objecthood whereas representational momentum requires the representation of a single object with coherent dynamics in time and space. The coexistence of these two phenomena supports the independent binding of stimuli and decisions over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据