4.7 Article

Proteomic profiling of the rat hippocampus from the kindling and pilocarpine models of epilepsy: potential targets in calcium regulatory network

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87555-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. research council of Tarbiat Modares University
  2. Iran's National Elites Foundation (INEF)
  3. Kazan Federal University [0671-2020-0058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteomic profiling of the rat hippocampus identified 144 differently expressed proteins in epilepsy models, most of which were associated with Ca2+ homeostasis. Inhibition of calcium influx by targeting ADPRC and LPAR3 attenuated epileptic seizures, suggesting polypharmacy with multiple targets as a potential treatment strategy for epilepsy.
Herein proteomic profiling of the rat hippocampus from the kindling and pilocarpine models of epilepsy was performed to achieve new potential targets for treating epileptic seizures. A total of 144 differently expressed proteins in both left and right hippocampi by two-dimensional electrophoresis coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption-mass spectrometry were identified across the rat models of epilepsy. Based on network analysis, the majority of differentially expressed proteins were associated with Ca2+ homeostasis. Changes in ADP-ribosyl cyclase (ADPRC), lysophosphatidic acid receptor 3 (LPAR3), calreticulin, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), synaptosomal nerve-associated protein 25 (SNAP 25) and transgelin 3 proteins were probed by Western blot analysis and validated using immunohistochemistry. Inhibition of calcium influx by 8-Bromo-cADP-Ribose (8-Br-cADPR) and 2-Aminoethyl diphenylborinate (2-APB) which act via the ADPRC and LPAR3, respectively, attenuated epileptic seizures. Considering a wide range of molecular events and effective role of calcium homeostasis in epilepsy, polypharmacy with multiple realistic targets should be further explored to reach the most effective treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据