4.7 Article

An improved biolistic delivery and analysis method for evaluation of DNA and CRISPR-Cas delivery efficacy in plant tissue

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86549-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2019-67013-29016]
  2. USDA NIFA Hatch project [IOW04714]
  3. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [60264-DNI7]
  4. 3M Non-tenured Faculty Award
  5. State of Iowa funds
  6. Crop Bioengineering Center of Iowa State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study improved the consistency of biolistic delivery results by using a double-barrel device and a cell counting software, demonstrating utility through optimizing conditions for DNA delivery and testing the efficacy of multiple gRNAs. The novel combination allows simultaneous comparison and optimization of parameters in biolistic delivery.
Biolistic delivery is widely used for genetic transformation but inconsistency between bombardment samples for transient gene expression analysis often hinders quantitative analyses. We developed a methodology to improve the consistency of biolistic delivery results by using a double-barrel device and a cell counting software. The double-barrel device enables a strategy of incorporating an internal control into each sample, which significantly decreases variance of the results. The cell counting software further reduces errors and increases throughput. The utility of this new platform is demonstrated by optimizing conditions for delivering DNA using the commercial transfection reagent TransIT-2020. In addition, the same approach is applied to test the efficacy of multiple gRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing. The novel combination of the bombardment device and analysis method allows simultaneous comparison and optimization of parameters in the biolistic delivery. The platform developed here can be broadly applied to any target samples using biolistics, including animal cells and tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据