4.5 Article

Characterization of tumor and adjacent peritumoral stroma in patients with breast cancer using high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging: Correlation with pathologic biomarkers

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
卷 85, 期 5, 页码 1004-1011

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.017

关键词

Breast neoplasm; Peritumoral stroma; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Apparent diffusion coefficient

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To assess whether ADC values of tumor and peritumoral stroma (PS) obtained on high-resolution diffusion -weighted imaging (HR DWI) were different according to pathologic biomarkers in patients with breast cancer. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 96 patients (age range, 30-75 years; mean, 52 years) with breast cancer who underwent HR DWI at 3T MR scanner. We obtained the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and ADC range of tumor and PS by drawing the region of interest (ROI) of entire tumor. We assessed histopathological features of tumors. ADC values of tumor and PS were compared according to pathologic biomarkers using student t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Mean ADC of tumor boundary was significantly higher in ER -negative tumors than in ER-positive tumors (P = 0.005). The ADC ranges of tumor boundary and proximal PS were significantly higher in tumors with high nuclear grade, negative ER, positive HER2, positive Ki67, and lymph node metastasis than those with low nuclear grade, positive ER, negative HER2, negative Ki67, and without lymph node metastasis (P< 0.05 for all). ADC range of tumor boundary and proximal PS was significantly lower in low risk tumor than in the others (P = 0.004 and 0.002). Mean ADC of whole tumor was significantly higher in low-risk tumor than in non-low-risk tumor (P = 0.030). Conclusion: On HR DWI, ADC ranges of tumor boundary and adjacent proximal PS were significantly lower in low-risk tumor than in non-low-risk tumors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据