4.7 Article

Diverse metabolic response of cancer cells treated with a 213Bi-anti-EGFR-immunoconjugate

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84421-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bonn, Germany) [Sonderforschungsbereich SFB 824]
  2. Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung (Munich, Germany)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized Bi-213-anti-EGFR-MAb to treat bladder and glioma cancer cells, revealing an early treatment response in bladder cancer cells but not in glioma cells.
Evaluation of treatment response is among the major challenges in modern oncology. We herein used a monoclonal antibody targeting the EGF receptor (EGFR) labelled with the alpha emitter Bi-213 (Bi-213-anti-EGFR-MAb). EJ28Luc (bladder) and LN18 (glioma) cancer cells, both overexpressing EGFR, were incubated for 3 h with the radioimmunoconjugate. To assess the responses in the core carbon metabolism upon this treatment, these cancer cell lines were subsequently cultivated for 18 h in the presence of [U-C-13(6)]glucose. C-13-enrichment and isotopologue profiles of key amino acids were monitored by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS), in order to monitor the impacts of the radionuclide-treatment upon glucose metabolism. In comparison to untreated controls, treatment of EJ28Luc cells with Bi-213-anti-EGFR-MAb resulted in a significantly decreased incorporation of C-13 from [U-C-13(6)]glucose into alanine, aspartate, glutamate, glycine, proline and serine. In sharp contrast, the same amino acids did not display less C-13-enrichments during treatment of the LN18 cells. The data indicate early treatment response of the bladder cancer cells, but not of the glioma cells though cell lines were killed following Bi-213-anti-EGFR-MAb treatment. The pilot study shows that the C-13-labelling approach is a valid tool to assess the responsiveness of cancer cells upon radionuclide-treatment in considerable metabolic detail.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据