4.7 Article

Reduced spontaneous itch in mouse models of cholestasis

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85660-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. TOP ZonMW Grant [91210054]
  2. Foundation Dioraphte [1115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, researchers found that scratch activity decreased rather than increased in cholestatic mice and wild type mice under cholestasis conditions, indicating that increased plasma ATX activity does not necessarily lead to exacerbated scratching behavior. This raises doubts about the suitability of mice for studying cholestatic itch perception.
Pruritus is one of the most distressing symptoms in cholestatic patients. Plasma autotaxin (ATX) activity correlates with the severity of pruritus in cholestatic patients, but the pathophysiology is unclear. To study pruritus in mice, we measured scratch activity in cholestatic Atp8b1 mutant mice, a model for Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis type 1, and wild type mice (WT) with alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate (ANIT)-induced cholestasis. To induce cholestasis, Atp8b1 mutant mice received a diet containing 0.1% cholic acid (CA) and WT mice were treated with ANIT. In these mice ATX was also overexpressed by transduction with AAV-ATX. Scratch activity was measured using an unbiased, electronic assay. Marked cholestasis was accomplished in both Atp8b1 mutant mice on a CA-supplemented diet and in ANIT-treatment in WT mice, but scratch activity was decreased rather than increased while plasma ATX activity was increased. Plasma ATX activity was further increased up to fivefold with AAV-ATX, but this did not induce scratch activity. In contrast to several reports two cholestatic mouse models did not display increased scratch activity as a measure of itch perception. Increasing plasma ATX activity by overexpression also did not lead to increased scratch activity in mice. This questions whether mice are suitable to study cholestatic itch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据