4.7 Article

Genome-wide discovery of G-quadruplexes in barley

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86838-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  2. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
  3. USDA-ARS [2030-21000-024-00-D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified and compared G4 motifs in barley with other monocot species, revealing their genomic distribution and molecular functions. The distribution of G4 motifs around genic regions was found to be relatively similar in the species studied, except for Arabidopsis.
G-quadruplexes (G4s) are four-stranded nucleic acid structures with closely spaced guanine bases forming square planar G-quartets. Aberrant formation of G4 structures has been associated with genomic instability. However, most plant species are lacking comprehensive studies of G4 motifs. In this study, genome-wide identification of G4 motifs in barley was performed, followed by a comparison of genomic distribution and molecular functions to other monocot species, such as wheat, maize, and rice. Similar to the reports on human and some plants like wheat, G4 motifs peaked around the 5 ' untranslated region (5 ' UTR), the first coding domain sequence, and the first intron start sites on antisense strands. Our comparative analyses in human, Arabidopsis, maize, rice, and sorghum demonstrated that the peak points could be erroneously merged into a single peak when large window sizes are used. We also showed that the G4 distributions around genic regions are relatively similar in the species studied, except in the case of Arabidopsis. G4 containing genes in monocots showed conserved molecular functions for transcription initiation and hydrolase activity. Additionally, we provided examples of imperfect G4 motifs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据