4.7 Article

eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Aage V. Jensen Naturfond
  2. 15. Juni Fonden
  3. Aalborg Zoo Conservation Foundation (AZCF) [3-2017]
  4. Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Action [656697]
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [656697] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques, particularly using eDNA extracted from feces of generalist predators, are increasingly important in biodiversity assessments. eDNA metabarcoding technology can detect more taxa and provide higher taxonomic resolution, serving as a crucial tool for verifying species identification and complementing traditional biodiversity assessments. In addition, dietary analysis using eDNA can help reveal consumed flora and fauna that may have been missed during field observations, enhancing the overall description of biodiversity.
With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from faeces from generalist predators, have recently been described as biodiversity capsules and suggested as a complementary tool for improving current biodiversity assessments. In this study, using faecal samples from two generalist omnivore species, the Eurasian badger and the red fox, we evaluated the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding in determining dietary composition, compared to macroscopic diet identification techniques. Subsequently, we used the dietary information obtained to assess its contribution to biodiversity assessments. Compared to classic macroscopic techniques, we found that eDNA metabarcoding detected more taxa, at higher taxonomic resolution, and proved to be an important technique to verify the species identification of the predator from field collected faeces. Furthermore, we showed how dietary analyses complemented field observations in describing biodiversity by identifying consumed flora and fauna that went unnoticed during field observations. While diet analysis approaches could not substitute field observations entirely, we suggest that their integration with other methods might overcome intrinsic limitations of single techniques in future biodiversity surveys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据