4.7 Review

The Role of Fructose in Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: Old Relationship and New Insights

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13041314

关键词

non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; fructose; metabolism; nutrients

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fructose, a naturally occurring simple sugar linked with glucose to form sucrose, is commonly found in hypercaloric food and beverages. Excessive fructose consumption is associated with the development and progression of NAFLD, leading to various detrimental effects on liver metabolism and potentially more severe clinical phenotypes.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents the result of hepatic fat overload not due to alcohol consumption and potentially evolving to advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Fructose is a naturally occurring simple sugar widely used in food industry linked to glucose to form sucrose, largely contained in hypercaloric food and beverages. An increasing amount of evidence in scientific literature highlighted a detrimental effect of dietary fructose consumption on metabolic disorders such as insulin resistance, obesity, hepatic steatosis, and NAFLD-related fibrosis as well. An excessive fructose consumption has been associated with NAFLD development and progression to more clinically severe phenotypes by exerting various toxic effects, including increased fatty acid production, oxidative stress, and worsening insulin resistance. Furthermore, some studies in this context demonstrated even a crucial role in liver cancer progression. Despite this compelling evidence, the molecular mechanisms by which fructose elicits those effects on liver metabolism remain unclear. Emerging data suggest that dietary fructose may directly alter the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism, including those that increase hepatic fat accumulation or reduce hepatic fat removal. This review aimed to summarize the current understanding of fructose metabolism on NAFLD pathogenesis and progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据