4.6 Article

The Mechanical Properties and Damage Evolution of UHPC Reinforced with Glass Fibers and High-Performance Polypropylene Fibers

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14092455

关键词

ultra-high-performance concrete; glass fibers; HPP fibers; concrete damage plasticity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [5177082878]
  2. Shanghai Sailing Program [20YF1451600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of glass fiber and high-performance polypropylene fiber on the mechanical properties of UHPC through experimental and numerical methods, finding that 2.0% fiber content provided better mechanical properties, and glass fiber had a more significant strengthening effect. Compared to HPP-UHPC, GF-UHPC showed about 20%, 30%, and 40% increase in compressive, tensile, and flexural strength, respectively.
Due to the sharp and corrosion-prone features of steel fibers, there is a demand for ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) reinforced with nonmetallic fibers. In this paper, glass fiber (GF) and the high-performance polypropylene (HPP) fiber were selected to prepare UHPC, and the effects of different fibers on the compressive, tensile and bending properties of UHPC were investigated, experimentally and numerically. Then, the damage evolution of UHPC was further studied numerically, adopting the concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) model. The difference between the simulation values and experimental values was within 5.0%, verifying the reliability of the numerical model. The results indicate that 2.0% fiber content in UHPC provides better mechanical properties. In addition, the glass fiber was more significant in strengthening the effect. Compared with HPP-UHPC, the compressive, tensile and flexural strength of GF-UHPC increased by about 20%, 30% and 40%, respectively. However, the flexural toughness indexes I-5, I-10 and I-20 of HPP-UHPC were about 1.2, 2.0 and 3.8 times those of GF-UHPC, respectively, showing that the toughening effect of the HPP fiber is better.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据