4.6 Review

Critical Raw Materials Saving by Protective Coatings under Extreme Conditions: A Review of Last Trends in Alloys and Coatings for Aerospace Engine Applications

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14071656

关键词

critical raw materials; protective coatings; thermal barrier coatings; aerospace engine blades; Ni-superalloys; Ti-based alloys

资金

  1. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [15102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the latest trends in coatings for high temperature alloys in aerospace engines, as well as scenarios for current and future savings of CRMs in alloys and coatings for aerospace engines. The aim is to raise awareness of the CRM issue in alloys and coatings for aerospace, and suggest mitigation measures without providing a comprehensive overview or a turnkey solution.
Several applications, where extreme conditions occur, require the use of alloys often containing many critical elements. Due to the ever increasing prices of critical raw materials (CRMs) linked to their high supply risk, and because of their fundamental and large utilization in high tech products and applications, it is extremely important to find viable solutions to save CRMs usage. Apart from increasing processes' efficiency, substitution, and recycling, one of the alternatives to preserve an alloy and increase its operating lifetime, thus saving the CRMs needed for its manufacturing, is to protect it by a suitable coating or a surface treatment. This review presents the most recent trends in coatings for application in high temperature alloys for aerospace engines. CRMs' current and future saving scenarios in the alloys and coatings for the aerospace engine are also discussed. The overarching aim of this paper is to raise awareness on the CRMs issue related to the alloys and coating for aerospace, suggesting some mitigation measures without having the ambition nor to give a complete overview of the topic nor a turnkey solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据