4.6 Article

A Unified Abaqus Implementation of the Phase Field Fracture Method Using Only a User Material Subroutine

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14081913

关键词

Abaqus; phase field fracture; finite element analysis; UMAT; fracture mechanics

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities of Spain [PGC2018-099695-B-I00]
  2. Royal Commission for the 1851 Exhibition [RF496/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a simple and robust implementation of the phase field fracture method in Abaqus, utilizing only the UMAT subroutine and showing potential and robustness in addressing various fracture scenarios. The new implementation is capable of reproducing numerical and experimental results, capturing complex crack trajectories, and solving contact problems efficiently, with the developed code freely available for use.
We present a simple and robust implementation of the phase field fracture method in Abaqus. Unlike previous works, only a user material (UMAT) subroutine is used. This is achieved by exploiting the analogy between the phase field balance equation and heat transfer, which avoids the need for a user element mesh and enables taking advantage of Abaqus' in-built features. A unified theoretical framework and its implementation are presented, suitable for any arbitrary choice of crack density function and fracture driving force. Specifically, the framework is exemplified with the so-called AT1, AT2 and phase field-cohesive zone models (PF-CZM). Both staggered and monolithic solution schemes are handled. We demonstrate the potential and robustness of this new implementation by addressing several paradigmatic 2D and 3D boundary value problems. The numerical examples show how the current implementation can be used to reproduce numerical and experimental results from the literature, and efficiently capture advanced features such as complex crack trajectories, crack nucleation from arbitrary sites and contact problems. The code developed is made freely available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据