Examination of a distress screening intervention for rural cancer survivors reveals low uptake of psychosocial referrals

Purpose To determine the impact of a telemedicine-delivered intervention aimed at identifying unmet needs and cancer-related distress (CRD) following the end of active treatment on supportive care referral patterns. Methods We used a quasi-experimental design to compare supportive care referral patterns between a group of rural cancer survivors receiving the intervention and a control group (N = 60). We evaluated the impact of the intervention on the number and type of referrals offered and whether or not the participant accepted the referral. CRD was measured using a modified version of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer and Problem List. Results Overall, 30% of participants received a referral for further post-treatment supportive care. Supporting the benefits of the intervention, the odds of being offered a referral were 13 times higher for those who received the intervention than those in the control group. However, even among the intervention group, only 28.6% of participants who were offered a referral for further psychosocial care accepted. Conclusions A nursing telemedicine visit was successful in identifying areas of high distress and increasing referrals. However, referral uptake was low, particularly for psychosocial support. Distance to care and stigma associated with seeking psychosocial care may be factors. Further study to improve referral uptake is warranted. Implications for Cancer Survivors Screening for CRD may be inadequate for cancer survivors unless patients can be successfully referred to further supportive care. Strategies to improve uptake of psychosocial referrals is of high importance for rural survivors, who are at higher risk of CRD.

Automated summary

A telemedicine-delivered intervention aimed at identifying unmet needs and cancer-related distress following active treatment had a significant impact on supportive care referral patterns. While the odds of being offered a referral were 13 times higher for those who received the intervention, only 28.6% of participants in the intervention group accepted further psychosocial care referrals. More research is needed to improve referral uptake for cancer survivors, especially in rural areas.