4.6 Article

Efficient quantum simulation of open quantum dynamics at various Hamiltonians and spectral densities

期刊

FRONTIERS OF PHYSICS
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11467-021-1064-y

关键词

nuclear magnetic resonance; quantum simulation; open quantum system

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11674033, 11474026, 11505007]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [1202017]
  3. JST PRESTO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simulation of open quantum dynamics for various photosynthetic systems shows that different spectral densities can impact energy transfer efficiency, and specific geometries and energy gaps can optimize energy transfer. The proposed approach proves to be universal for simulating the exact quantum dynamics of photosynthetic systems.
Simulation of open quantum dynamics for various Hamiltonians and spectral densities are ubiquitous for studying various quantum systems. On a quantum computer, only log(2)N qubits are required for the simulation of an N-dimensional quantum system, hence simulation in a quantum computer can greatly reduce the computational complexity compared with classical methods. Recently, a quantum simulation approach was proposed for studying photosynthetic light harvesting [npj Quantum Inf. 4, 52 (2018)]. In this paper, we apply the approach to simulate the open quantum dynamics of various photosynthetic systems. We show that for Drude-Lorentz spectral density, the dimerized geometries with strong couplings within the donor and acceptor clusters respectively exhibit significantly improved efficiency. We also demonstrate that the overall energy transfer can be optimized when the energy gap between the donor and acceptor clusters matches the optimum of the spectral density. The effects of different types of baths, e.g., Ohmic, sub-Ohmic, and super-Ohmic spectral densities are also studied. The present investigations demonstrate that the proposed approach is universal for simulating the exact quantum dynamics of photosynthetic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据