4.7 Review

The Next Decade of Immune Checkpoint Therapy

期刊

CANCER DISCOVERY
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 838-857

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1680

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immune checkpoint therapy can provide durable antitumor responses for subsets of cancer patients, but challenges remain in understanding resistance mechanisms, optimizing patient selection, managing immune-related adverse events, and identifying rational therapeutic combinations. A focused approach encompassing clinical and basic research with integration of reverse translational studies is needed to address these challenges and guide the development of novel combination strategies.
Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) can provide durable clinical responses and improve overall survival. However, only subsets of patients with specific tumor types respond to ICT. Thus, significant challenges remain, including understanding pathways of resistance, optimizing patient selection, improving management of immune-related adverse events, and identifying rational therapeutic combinations. These challenges will need a focused approach encompassing both clinical and basic research, with the integration of reverse translational studies. This integrated approach will lead to identification of potential targets for subsequent clinical trials, which will guide decisions as we develop novel combination strategies to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicities for patients. Significance: ICTs induce durable antitumor responses for subsets of patients with cancer. Recent evidence suggests that rational combinatorial strategies can improve response by overcoming primary and adaptive resistance mechanisms, although these may carry an increased risk of immune-mediated toxicities. This review surveys the current understanding of mechanisms of response and resistance to ICTs and active areas of investigation, and proposes a path forward to improving efficacy and minimizing toxicities through better patient selection and rational combinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据