4.5 Article

Implementation of a first-trimester prognostic model to improve screening for gestational diabetes mellitus

期刊

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03749-x

关键词

Prognostic model; Clinical prediction rule; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Selective screening; Implementation; Impact analysis; NoMAD; MIDI; Normalization process theory; Risk communication

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development [209020004, 2090100031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improving the accuracy of identifying women at risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is important for better outcomes. This study successfully implemented a prognostic model for GDM risk assessment, which was well received by healthcare professionals and pregnant women. Prognostic models should be recommended for adoption in guidelines.
BackgroundImprovement in the accuracy of identifying women who are at risk to develop gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is warranted, since timely diagnosis and treatment improves the outcomes of this common pregnancy disorder. Although prognostic models for GDM are externally validated and outperform current risk factor based selective approaches, there is little known about the impact of such models in day-to-day obstetric care.MethodsA prognostic model was implemented as a directive clinical prediction rule, classifying women as low- or high-risk for GDM, with subsequent distinctive care pathways including selective midpregnancy testing for GDM in high-risk women in a prospective multicenter birth cohort comprising 1073 pregnant women without pre-existing diabetes and 60 obstetric healthcare professionals included in nine independent midwifery practices and three hospitals in the Netherlands (effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 study). Model performance (c-statistic) and implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, sustainability) were evaluated after 6 months by indicators and implementation instruments (NoMAD; MIDI).ResultsThe adherence to the prognostic model (c-statistic 0.85 (95%CI 0.81-0.90)) was 95% (n=1021). Healthcare professionals scored 3.7 (IQR 3.3-4.0) on implementation instruments on a 5-point Likert scale. Important facilitators were knowledge, willingness and confidence to use the model, client cooperation and opportunities for reconfiguration. Identified barriers mostly related to operational and organizational issues. Regardless of risk-status, pregnant women appreciated first-trimester information on GDM risk-status and lifestyle advice to achieve risk reduction, respectively 89% (n=556) and 90% (n=564)).ConclusionsThe prognostic model was successfully implemented and well received by healthcare professionals and pregnant women. Prognostic models should be recommended for adoption in guidelines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据