4.5 Article

Respectful maternal and newborn care: measurement in one EN-BIRTH study hospital in Nepal

期刊

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH
卷 21, 期 SUPPL, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03516-4

关键词

Respectful maternal and newborn care; Mistreatment; Nepal; Maternal; Newborn; Coverage; Respect; Privacy; Delivery; Standard of care

资金

  1. Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. CIFF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on measuring respectful care for women and newborns after hospital birth in Pokhara, Nepal. Results showed that women generally reported 100% respectful care for themselves and their babies. Specific questions and stratification by mode of birth, women's age, and ethnicity are important to identify mistreatment during care and prioritize action.
BackgroundRespectful maternal and newborn care (RMNC) is an important component of high-quality care but progress is impeded by critical measurement gaps for women and newborns. The Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study was an observational study with mixed methods assessing measurement validity for coverage and quality of maternal and newborn indicators. This paper reports results regarding the measurement of respectful care for women and newborns.MethodsAt one EN-BIRTH study site in Pokhara, Nepal, we included additional questions during exit-survey interviews with women about their experiences (July 2017-July 2018). The questionnaire was based on seven mistreatment typologies: Physical; Sexual; or Verbal abuse; Stigma/discrimination; Failure to meet professional standards of care; Poor rapport between women and providers; and Health care denied due to inability to pay. We calculated associations between these typologies and potential determinants of health - ethnicity, age, sex, mode of birth - as possible predictors for reporting poor care.ResultsAmong 4296 women interviewed, none reported physical, sexual, or verbal abuse. 15.7% of women were dissatisfied with privacy, and 13.0% of women reported their birth experience did not meet their religious and cultural needs. In descriptive analysis, adjusted odds ratios and multivariate analysis showed primiparous women were less likely to report respectful care (beta =0.23, p-value <0.0001). Women from Madeshi (a disadvantaged ethnic group) were more likely to report poor care (=-0.34; p-value 0.037) than women identifying as Chettri/Brahmin. Women who had caesarean section were less likely to report poor care during childbirth (beta=-0.42; p-value <0.0001) than women with a vaginal birth. However, babies born by caesarean had a 98% decrease in the odds (aOR=0.02, 95% CI, 0.01-0.05) of receiving skin-to-skin contact than those with vaginal births.ConclusionsMeasurement of respectful care at exit interview after hospital birth is challenging, and women generally reported 100% respectful care for themselves and their baby. Specific questions, with stratification by mode of birth, women's age and ethnicity, are important to identify those mistreated during care and to prioritise action. More research is needed to develop evidence-based measures to track experience of care, including zero separation for the mother-newborn pair, and to improve monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据