4.5 Article

Role of suppression of endometriosis with progestins before IVF-ET: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

期刊

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03736-2

关键词

Endometriosis; IVF-ICSI; Dienogest; Progestins; GnRH-analogue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study suggests that Dienogest is a suitable and safe alternative to GnRHa pretreatment in patients with endometriosis, with lower cost, fewer side effects, higher FertiQoL treatment scores, and better tolerability.
Background: Endometriosis affects the responsiveness to ovarian stimulation. This study aimed to assess the role of Dienogest pretreatment for endometriosis suppression as compared to Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in patients with endometriosis pursuing IVF treatment. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 134 women with endometriosis-related infertility were randomly allocated to group A (n = 67) who had monthly depot GnRHa for 3 months before ovarian stimulation in IVF treatment (Ultra-long protocol), and Group B (n = 67) who had daily oral Dienogest 2 mg/d for 3 months before starting standard long protocol for IVF. The primary outcome measure was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcome measures included the number of mature oocytes, fertilization rate, quality of life assessed by FertiQoL scores, cost of treatment, and pregnancy outcomes. Results: Although there was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding ovarian stimulation, response parameters, and pregnancy outcomes, the Dienogest group had a lower cost of treatment (2773 vs. 3664 EGP, P < 0.001), lower side effects (29.9% vs. 59.7%, P < 0.001), higher FertiQoL treatment scores (33.2 vs. 25.1, P < 0.001) and higher tolerability scores (14.1 vs. 9.4, P < 0.001 < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study indicates that Dienogest is a suitable and safe substitute for GnRHa pretreatment in endometriosis patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据