4.4 Article

lImplants and Breast Pocket Irrigation: Outcomes of Antibiotic, Antiseptic, and Saline Irrigation

期刊

AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 NP102-NP111

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab181

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study supports the use of antibiotics or povidone-iodine for breast implant irrigation, showing advantages in reducing capsular contracture and reoperation rates. Further research is needed to determine which irrigation method is superior.
Background: Breast implant-associated infection and capsular contracture are challenging complications that can result in poor outcomes following implant-based breast surgery. Antimicrobial irrigation of the breast pocket or implant is a widely accepted strategy to prevent these complications, but the literature lacks an evidence-based consensus on the optimal irrigation solution. Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to compare clinical outcomes, specifically capsular contracture, infection, and reoperation rates, associated with the use of antibiotic, antiseptic, and saline irrigation. Methods: A systematic review was performed in March 2020 based on the following search terms: breast implant, irrigation, antibiotic, bacitracin, antiseptic, povidone iodine, betadine, low concentration chlorhexidine, and hypochlorous acid. Capsular contracture, infection, and reoperation rates were compared by analysis of forest plots. Results: Out of the 104 articles screened, 14 met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in capsular contracture rates between antibiotic and povidone-iodine irrigation, although the data comparing these 2 groups were limited and confounded by the concurrent use of steroids. Antibiotic irrigation showed a significantly lower rate of capsular contracture compared with saline irrigation and a lower rate of capsular contracture and reoperation compared with no irrigation at all. Povidone-iodine was associated with lower rates of capsular contracture and reoperation compared with saline irrigation but there were no data on infection rates specific to povidone-iodine irrigation. Conclusions: Our study supports the use of antibiotics or povidone-iodine for breast implant irrigation. Further research is required to better determine which of these 2 irrigation types is superior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据