4.8 Review

Electrochemical Zinc Ion Capacitors: Fundamentals, Materials, and Systems

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202100201

关键词

electrochemical zinc‐ ion capacitors; electrolytes; porous carbon; pseudocapacitance; zinc anodes

资金

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology-King Abdulaziz University (KAUST-KAU) Initiative [OSR-2018 KAUST-KAU-3903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc ion capacitors (ZICs) are hybrid supercapacitors with porous carbon cathodes and zinc anodes, offering potential for safe, high-power, and low-cost energy storage. Despite the attention they have garnered, challenges remain in the form of low energy densities, limited cycling stability, and poor zinc anode stability. Future research is needed to address these challenges and improve the scalability and cost-effectiveness of ZICs for energy storage applications.
An electrochemical zinc ion capacitor (ZIC) is a hybrid supercapacitor composed of a porous carbon cathode and a zinc anode. Based on the low-cost features of carbon and zinc metal, ZIC is a potential candidate for safe, high-power, and low-cost energy storage applications. ZICs have gained tremendous attention in recent years. However, the low energy densities and limited cycling stability are still major challenges for developing high-performance ZICs. First, the energy density of ZIC is limited by the low capacitance of porous carbon cathodes. Second, aqueous electrolytes induce parasitic reactions, which results in limited voltage windows and poor cycling performances of ZICs. Third, the poor stabilities and low utilization of zinc anodes remain major challenges to develop practical ZICs. This review summarizes the recent progress in developing ZICs and highlights both the promising and challenging attributes of this emerging energy storage technology. Future research directions are proposed for developing better, lower cost, and more scalable ZICs for energy storage applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据