4.8 Article

Ultrahigh Phosphorus Doping of Carbon for High-Rate Sodium Ion Batteries Anode

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202003911

关键词

hard carbon; high‐ rate; phosphorus protrusion; sodium‐ ion batteries; ultrahigh phosphorus doping

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51977097, U1766216, 51774148, 51861135315]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel synthesis strategy was proposed to prepare ultrahigh phosphorus-doped carbon (UPC) anodes for high performance sodium ion batteries, achieving a high phosphorus content and substitutional phosphorus in the carbon lattice, leading to significant improvement in sodium ion storage performance.
Phosphorus doped carbons are of particular interest as anode materials because of their large interlayer spacing and strong adsorption of Na+ ions. However, it remains challenging to achieve high phosphorus doping due to the limited choices of phosphorus sources and the difficulty in constructing oxygen-free synthesis system. Herein, a new synthesis strategy is proposed to prepare ultrahigh phosphorus-doped carbon (UPC) anodes for high performance sodium ion batteries (SIBs). By using two commonly available, miscible, evaporable liquids in PCl3 and C6H12, as phosphorus and carbon sources, an oxygen-free reaction system is successfully established by N-2 bubbling to simultaneously realize carbonization and in situ P doping. The P content can reach 30 wt%, much higher than most reported P-doping carbon-based materials. Furthermore, the doped P is dominated by substitutional P-(C-3) protrusions in the carbon lattice, which can significantly enlarge the interlayer spacing and enhance the adsorption energy of Na+. When serving as the SIBs anode, the UPC delivers an ultrahigh reversible capacity of 510.4 mAh g(-1) with a rational operating voltage of 0.54 V, and the best rate capability of 397.1 mAh g(-1) at 10 A g(-1). This new strategy will effectively promote the practical application of hard carbon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据