4.8 Article

Linear Regression Model Development for Analysis of Asymmetric Copper-Bisoxazoline Catalysis

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 3916-3922

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.1c00531

关键词

asymmetric catalysis; copper; bisoxazoline; data science; carbene; Lewis acid; radical

资金

  1. NIH [R35 GM136271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilizes multivariate linear regression analysis to investigate different categories of BOX catalyzed reactions, developing predictive models for various asymmetric catalytic reactions including Cu, Ni, Fe, Mg, and Pd complexes, and reveals the structural requirements necessary for high selectivity through analysis of diverse organometallic intermediates.
Multivariate linear regression (MLR) analysis is used to unify and correlate different categories of asymmetric Cubisoxazoline (BOX) catalysis. The versatility of Cu-BOX complexes has been leveraged for several types of enantioselective transformations including cyclopropanation, Diels-Alder cycloadditions, and difunctionalization of alkenes. Statistical tools and extensive molecular featurization have guided the development of an inclusive linear regression model, providing a predictive platform and readily interpretable descriptors. Mechanism-specific categorization of curated data sets and parameterization of reaction components allow for simultaneous analysis of disparate organometallic intermediates such as carbenes and Lewis acid adducts, all unified by a common ligand scaffold and metal ion. Additionally, this workflow permitted the development of a complementary linear regression model correlating analogous BOX-catalyzed reactions employing Ni, Fe, Mg, and Pd complexes. Comparison of ligand parameters in each model reveals the relevant structural requirements necessary for high selectivity. Overall, this strategy highlights the utility of MLR analysis in exploring mechanistically driven correlations across a diverse chemical space in organometallic chemistry and presents an applicable workflow for related ligand classes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据