4.8 Article

ZBP1 not RIPK1 mediates tumor necroptosis in breast cancer

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23004-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals ZBP1 as a key regulator of tumor necroptosis, mediating the process during tumor development and serving as a potential drug target to control tumor metastasis. ZBP1 expression is closely related to tumor necrosis, and can trigger necroptosis under glucose deprivation.
Tumor necrosis happens commonly in advanced solid tumors. We reported that necroptosis plays a major role in tumor necrosis. Although several key necroptosis regulators including receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) have been identified, the regulation of tumor necroptosis during tumor development remains elusive. Here, we report that Z-DNA-binding protein 1 (ZBP1), not RIPK1, mediates tumor necroptosis during tumor development in preclinical cancer models. We found that ZBP1 expression is dramatically elevated in necrotic tumors. Importantly, ZBP1, not RIPK1, deletion blocks tumor necroptosis during tumor development and inhibits metastasis. We showed that glucose deprivation triggers ZBP1-depedent necroptosis in tumor cells. Glucose deprivation causes mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) release to the cytoplasm and the binding of mtDNA to ZBP1 to activate MLKL in a BCL-2 family protein, NOXA-dependent manner. Therefore, our study reveals ZBP1 as the key regulator of tumor necroptosis and provides a potential drug target for controlling tumor metastasis. Tumour necroptosis is regulated by RIPK3 during tumour development. Here the authors show that ZBP1 is an upstream mediator of RIPK3 in tumour necroptosis and that glucose deprivation induces the release of mitochondrial DNA, which binds to ZBP1 to activate ZBP1-mediated necroptosis in breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据