4.8 Article

Conserved human effector Treg cell transcriptomic and epigenetic signature in arthritic joint inflammation

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22975-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. VIDI grant from ZonMw [91714332]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study illustrates the effector characteristics of human Treg cells under inflammatory conditions and their epigenetic influences, indicating that inflammation-derived Treg cells have specific features and are fine-tuned by environmental adaptations.
Treg cells are critical regulators of immune homeostasis, and environment-driven Treg cell differentiation into effector (e)Treg cells is crucial for optimal functioning. However, human Treg cell programming in inflammation is unclear. Here, we combine transcriptional and epigenetic profiling to identify a human eTreg cell signature. Inflammation-derived functional Treg cells have a transcriptional profile characterized by upregulation of both a core Treg cell (FOXP3, CTLA4, TIGIT) and effector program (GITR, BLIMP-1, BATF). We identify a specific human eTreg cell signature that includes the vitamin D receptor (VDR) as a predicted regulator in eTreg cell differentiation. H3K27ac/H3K4me1 occupancy indicates an altered (super-)enhancer landscape, including enrichment of the VDR and BATF binding motifs. The Treg cell profile has striking overlap with tumor-infiltrating Treg cells. Our data demonstrate that human inflammation-derived Treg cells acquire a conserved and specific eTreg cell profile guided by epigenetic changes, and fine-tuned by environment-specific adaptations. T regulatory (Treg) cells can differentiate into effector Treg (eTreg) cells that might be functional in inflammatory diseases. Using RNA sequencing and epigenetic profiling, the authors show that eTreg signatures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis joints are similar to tumour microenvironment (TME) Treg cells and are affected by tissue-specific epigenetic regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据