4.8 Article

Activation of GPR37 in macrophages confers protection against infection-induced sepsis and pain-like behaviour in mice

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21940-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Duke University Anesthesiology Research funds
  2. NIH [DP2 AI138239, T32 GM008600]
  3. John J. Bonica fellowship from the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP)
  4. Duke Microbiome Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GPR37 was found to have a protective role in multiple infection and sepsis models, with mice lacking Gpr37 showing increased mortality following infection challenges. The drugs ARU and NPD1 could protect wild-type mice from sepsis, but this protection was lost in Gpr37-deficient mice.
GPR37 was discovered more than two decades ago, but its biological functions remain poorly understood. Here we report a protective role of GPR37 in multiple models of infection and sepsis. Mice lacking Gpr37 exhibited increased death and/or hypothermia following challenge by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), Listeria bacteria, and the mouse malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei. Sepsis induced by LPS and Listeria in wild-type mice is protected by artesunate (ARU) and neuroprotectin D1 (NPD1), but the protective actions of these agents are lost in Gpr37(-/-) mice. Notably, we found that ARU binds to GPR37 in macrophages and promotes phagocytosis and clearance of pathogens. Moreover, ablation of macrophages potentiated infection, sepsis, and their sequelae, whereas adoptive transfer of NPD1- or ARU-primed macrophages reduced infection, sepsis, and pain-like behaviors. Our findings reveal physiological actions of ARU in host cells by activating macrophages and suggest that GPR37 agonists may help to treat sepsis, bacterial infections, and malaria. GPR37 is expressed in macrophages, and has been implicated in resolution of inflammatory pain. Here the authors show that GPR37 can modulate sepsis in several animal models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据