4.8 Article

Differences in subcortico-cortical interactions identified from connectome and microcircuit models in autism

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21732-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2020R1A6A3A03037088]
  2. Molson Neuro-Engineering fellowship by Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (MNI)
  3. Fonds de la Recherche du Quebec-Sante (FRQ-S)
  4. FRQ-S
  5. Healthy Brains for Healthy Lives (HBHL) postdoctoral fellowship
  6. British Academy Post-Doctoral Fellowship
  7. Autism Research Trust
  8. Simons Foundation [SFARI 400101]
  9. Brain and Behavior Foundation (NARSAD - National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression)
  10. European Research Council (ERC - DISCONN) [GA802371]
  11. NIH [1R21MH116473-01A1]
  12. Telethon foundation [GGP19177]
  13. Singapore NRF Fellowship
  14. National University of Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine [NUHSRO/2020/124/TMR/LOA]
  15. European Research Council [WANDERINGMINDS-ERC646927]
  16. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [1304413]
  17. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CIHR FDN-154298]
  18. SickKids Foundation [NI17-039]
  19. Azrieli Center for Autism Research (ACAR-TACC)
  20. BrainCanada (Azrieli Future Leaders)
  21. Tier-2 Canada Research Chairs program
  22. MNI-Cambridge collaborative award
  23. Common Fund of the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health
  24. NCI
  25. NHGRI
  26. NHLBI
  27. NIDA
  28. NIMH
  29. NINDS
  30. Ministry of Science & ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea [IBS-R015-D1-2021-A00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that there are significant differences in structural connectome organization in individuals with autism compared to typically developing controls, particularly in low-level somatosensory regions and high-level association cortices. Computational models reveal that macroscale anomalies are related to atypical increases in recurrent excitation/inhibition and subcortical inputs into cortical microcircuits in sensory and motor areas.
The pathophysiology of autism has been suggested to involve a combination of both macroscale connectome miswiring and microcircuit anomalies. Here, we combine connectome-wide manifold learning with biophysical simulation models to understand associations between global network perturbations and microcircuit dysfunctions in autism. We studied neuroimaging and phenotypic data in 47 individuals with autism and 37 typically developing controls obtained from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange initiative. Our analysis establishes significant differences in structural connectome organization in individuals with autism relative to controls, with strong between-group effects in low-level somatosensory regions and moderate effects in high-level association cortices. Computational models reveal that the degree of macroscale anomalies is related to atypical increases of recurrent excitation/inhibition, as well as subcortical inputs into cortical microcircuits, especially in sensory and motor areas. Transcriptomic association analysis based on postmortem datasets identifies genes expressed in cortical and thalamic areas from childhood to young adulthood. Finally, supervised machine learning finds that the macroscale perturbations are associated with symptom severity scores on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule. Together, our analyses suggest that atypical subcortico-cortical interactions are associated with both microcircuit and macroscale connectome differences in autism. Autism is increasingly recognized to impact multiple scales of neural organization. Here, the authors show alterations in individuals with autism relative to typically developing controls, with findings particularly pointing to atypically organized subcortical-cortical networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据