4.8 Article

High-performance large-area quasi-2D perovskite light-emitting diodes

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22529-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21771114, 91956130, 12074104, 11804084]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [18YFZCGX00580]
  3. Distinguished Young Scholars of Tianjin [19JCJQJC62000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of perovskite light-emitting diodes tends to decline as the active area increases, with severe phase-segregation identified as the cause. The introduction of L-Norvaline to construct an intermediate phase has successfully suppressed the phase-segregation, resulting in highly-efficient large-area quasi-2D films.
Serious performance decline arose for perovskite light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs) once the active area was enlarged. Here we investigate the failure mechanism of the widespread active film fabrication method; and ascribe severe phase-segregation to be the reason. We thereby introduce L-Norvaline to construct a COO--coordinated intermediate phase with low formation enthalpy. The new intermediate phase changes the crystallization pathway, thereby suppressing the phase-segregation. Accordingly, high-quality large-area quasi-2D films with desirable properties are obtained. Based on this, we further rationally adjusted films' recombination kinetics. We reported a series of highly-efficient green quasi-2D PeLEDs with active areas of 9.0 cm(2). The peak EQE of 16.4% is achieved in = 3, represent the most efficient large-area PeLEDs yet. Meanwhile, high brightness device with luminance up to 9.1 x 10(4)cdm(-2) has achieved in = 10 film. Performance of perovskite LED tends to decline as the active area increases, thus understanding the failure mechanism is paramount to surmount this limitation. Here, the authors report severe phase-segregation to be the cause, and introduce L-Norvaline to overcome it, as the result, highly-efficient 9.0 cm(2) green PeLED is realised.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据