4.5 Review

Acupuncture for Cancer-Related Anorexia: a Review of the Current Evidence

期刊

CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01067-1

关键词

Acupuncture; Integrative medicine; Complimentary medicine; Anorexia; Loss of appetite; Cancer-related

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health through Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA016672]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acupuncture, as a part of traditional Chinese medicine practice, has shown effectiveness in managing many cancer- and treatment-related symptoms, especially chemotherapy-induced or postoperative nausea. However, the efficacy of acupuncture in treating cancer-related anorexia/loss of appetite is not clear. The current level of evidence is insufficient to make a definitive conclusion on the benefit of acupuncture/moxibustion for treating chronic cancer-related anorexia/appetite problems, and future large randomized controlled trials of high methodological quality are needed.
Purpose of Review Loss of appetite/anorexia is extremely common among cancer patients, affecting as many as half of newly diagnosed patients and 70% of patients with advanced disease. Effective management of this disabling symptom of cancer remains a major challenge in the field of oncology. We conducted a systematic review of the current evidence on acupuncture and/or moxibustion as an intervention for cancer-related anorexia. Recent Findings Acupuncture, as a part of traditional Chinese medicine practice, has demonstrated effectiveness in managing many cancer- and treatment-related symptoms, especially chemotherapy-induced or postoperative nausea. However, the efficacy of acupuncture in treating cancer-related anorexia/loss of appetite is not clear. Summary The current level of evidence is insufficient to make a definitive conclusion on the benefit of acupuncture/moxibustion for treating chronic cancer-related anorexia/appetite problems. Future large randomized controlled trials of high methodological quality are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据