4.6 Article

Validity evidence for a novel instrument assessing medical student attitudes toward instruction in implicit bias recognition and management

期刊

BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02640-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [AMFDP 70639]
  2. Macy Faculty Scholars Program of the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health [R25HD068835-01, K23MD014178]
  4. Grants for Excellence in Medical Education, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  5. NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Einstein-Montefiore CTSA [KL2TR001071, TL1TR001072, UL1TR001073]
  6. AHRQ [R25HS023199]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ATIBI is a reliable and valid tool for measuring medical student attitudes related to implicit bias recognition and management, including attitudes towards self-acceptance of bias, implicit bias education, and its relevance to clinical care.
Background: Implicit bias instruction is becoming more prevalent in health professions education, with calls for skills-based curricula moving from awareness and recognition to management of implicit bias. Evidence suggests that health professionals and students learning about implicit bias (learners) have varying attitudes about instruction in implicit bias, including the concept of implicit bias itself. Assessing learner attitudes could inform curriculum development and enable instructional designs that optimize learner engagement. To date, there are no instruments with evidence for construct validity that assess learner attitudes about implicit bias instruction and its relevance to clinical care. Methods: The authors developed a novel instrument, the Attitude Towards Implicit Bias Instrument (ATIBI) and gathered evidence for three types of construct validity-content, internal consistency, and relationship to other variables. Results: Authors utilized a modified Delphi technique with an interprofessional team of experts, as well as cognitive interviews with medical students leading to item refinement to improve content validity. Seven cohorts of medical students, N = 1072 completed the ATIBI. Psychometric analysis demonstrated high internal consistency (alpha = 0.90). Exploratory factor analysis resulted in five factors. Analysis of a subset of 100 medical students demonstrated a moderate correlation with similar instruments, the Integrative Medicine Attitude Questionnaire (r = 0.63, 95% CI: [0.59, 0.66]) and the Internal Motivation to Respond Without Prejudice Scale (r = 0.36, 95% CI: [0.32, 0.40]), providing evidence for convergent validity. Scores on our instrument had low correlation to the External Motivation to Respond Without Prejudice Scale (r = 0.15, 95% CI: [0.09, 0.19]) and the Groningen Reflection Ability Scale (r = 0.12, 95% CI: [0.06, 0.17]) providing evidence for discriminant validity. Analysis resulted in eighteen items in the final instrument; it is easy to administer, both on paper form and online. Conclusion: The Attitudes Toward Implicit Bias Instrument is a novel instrument that produces reliable and valid scores and may be used to measure medical student attitudes related to implicit bias recognition and management, including attitudes toward acceptance of bias in oneself, implicit bias instruction, and its relevance to clinical care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据