4.5 Article

A clinicopathological reappraisal of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB): a continuous spectrum with papillary cholangiocarcinoma in 181 curatively resected cases

期刊

HPB
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 1525-1532

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.03.004

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to reevaluate two types of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile-duct (IPNB) and found that Type-1 tumors were the least advanced pathologically, while Type-2 and Type-Unclassifiable tumors showed gradual progression. The scoring system successfully differentiated between the different types of tumors based on six pathological features.
Background: Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile-duct (IPNB) has recently been further subclassified into so-called IPNBs (Type-1) and narrow-sense papillary cholangiocarcinomas (Type 2), but their differential diagnosis is challenging. This study aimed to reevaluate Type-1 and Type-2 IPNBs. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent papillary bile-duct tumor resection were included. Using six pathological features (location, mucin secretion, histological architecture, histological type, presence of a low/intermediate-dysplasia component, and proportion of the invasive component), all papillary tumors were scored. Tumors scoring 5-6 were classified as Type-1, 0-1 as Type-2, and 2-4 as Type-Unclassifiable. Results: The 181 papillary bile-duct tumor patients were divided into three groups, consisting of 12 Type-1, 46 Type-2, and 123 Type-Unclassifiable-gray-zone lesions between Type-1 and Type-2 that constituted the largest proportion of papillary tumors. Type-1 tumors were pathologically the least advanced, while the other types showed gradual advancement. The 5-year survival rate was better for patients with Type-1 tumors than for those with Type-Unclassifiable or Type-2 tumors. Conclusion: The scoring system worked well to delineate a continuous spectrum of pathologic features ranging from Type-1, through Type-Unclassifiable, to Type-2, the latter two being challenging to differentially diagnose. Type-1 is regarded as an early neoplasm of Type-Unclassifiable and Type-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据