4.6 Article

Investigating the Mechanism of Sodium Binding to SERT Using Direct Simulations

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.673782

关键词

human serotonin transporter; sodium binding; kinetics; sodium binding pathway; molecular dynamics simulations; SERT

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 32017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The serotonin transporter (SERT) plays a crucial role in terminating neurotransmission and its altered function is linked to various neurological diseases. Through molecular dynamics simulations, researchers identified a well-defined pathway for sodium entry into SERT, shedding light on the initial step of the serotonin transport cycle. The induced-fit mechanism accompanying sodium binding leads to new conformations and reduced local dynamics, providing insights into the transport process.
The serotonin transporter (SERT) terminates neurotransmission by transporting serotonin from the synapse into the pre-synaptic nerve terminal. Altered SERT function leads to several neurological diseases including depression, anxiety, mood disorders, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD). Accordingly SERT is the target for their pharmacological treatments, but also targeted by multiple drugs of abuse. Transport of serotonin by SERT is energized by the transmembrane electrochemical gradient of sodium. We used extensive molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the process of sodium binding to SERT, which is the first step in the transport cycle that leads to serotonin uptake. Comparing data from 51 independent simulations, we find a remarkably well-defined path for sodium entry and could identify two transient binding sites, while observing binding kinetics that are comparable to experimental data. Importantly, the structure and dynamics of the sodium binding sites indicate that sodium binding is accompanied by an induced-fit mechanism that leads to new conformations and reduces local dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据