4.5 Article

Improving the Sound Absorption of Natural Waste Material-based Sound Absorbers Using Micro-perforated Plates

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS
卷 19, 期 13, 页码 5199-5210

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2021.1875364

关键词

Sound; micro-perforated plate; natural waste; fiber; sugarcane; wool

资金

  1. National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD) of Iran [987822]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that using micro-perforated panels with different thicknesses and porous materials can improve sound absorption performance, but may also affect the absorption coefficient and frequency range. Therefore, a balance between these factors needs to be considered in the design process.
Both natural and synthetic fibers do not perform well at low frequencies and are also subjected to erosion, moisture, fire, etc., when used as an interior finish of room walls. To overcome these problems, micro-perforated plate with different thickness is used in a multilayer sound absorber configuration to improve its sound absorption. Firstly, the acoustic properties of five natural wastes including sheep wool, goat wool, camel wool as well as pith and fiber bundles of sugarcane bagasse were determined by using an impedance tube following ISO 10534-2. Secondly, the effect of Panel thickness was investigated. The maximum sound absorption coefficient (SAC) of natural waste materials is at middle to high-frequency range and this shifted to lower frequency as the porous layer thickness increases. The sound absorption performance depends on the thickness of perforated plate and porous layer in a compound sound absorber. It is observed that the using perforated plate in the front of low thickness porous materials significantly improve the SAC and absorption bandwidth. However, it should be noted that this reduces the SAC at high frequencies. Accordingly, the thick micro-perforated panels backed by porous layer are not recommended to control sounds with frequency higher than 3000 Hz.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据