4.6 Article

Genetic Diversity of Enteric Viruses in Children under Five Years Old in Gabon

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v13040545

关键词

enteric viruses; children; phylogenetic analysis; diarrhea; Gabon

类别

资金

  1. European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) [EDCTP-RegNet 2015-1045, EDCTP-RIA2016E-1609]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enteric viruses are the leading cause of diarrhea in children worldwide, with norovirus and astrovirus being the most common in Gabonese children under five years old, while aichivirus A was first reported in the area and also prevalent.
Enteric viruses are the leading cause of diarrhea in children globally. Identifying viral agents and understanding their genetic diversity could help to develop effective preventive measures. This study aimed to determine the detection rate and genetic diversity of four enteric viruses in Gabonese children aged below five years. Stool samples from children <5 years with (n = 177) and without (n = 67) diarrhea were collected from April 2018 to November 2019. Norovirus, astrovirus, sapovirus, and aichivirus A were identified using PCR techniques followed by sequencing and phylogenetic analyses. At least one viral agent was identified in 23.2% and 14.9% of the symptomatic and asymptomatic participants, respectively. Norovirus (14.7%) and astrovirus (7.3%) were the most prevalent in children with diarrhea, whereas in the healthy group norovirus (9%) followed by the first reported aichivirus A in Gabon (6%) were predominant. The predominant norovirus genogroup was GII, consisting mostly of genotype GII.P31-GII.4 Sydney. Phylogenetic analysis of the 3CD region of the aichivirus A genome revealed the presence of two genotypes (A and C) in the study cohort. Astrovirus and sapovirus showed a high diversity, with five different astrovirus genotypes and four sapovirus genotypes, respectively. Our findings give new insights into the circulation and genetic diversity of enteric viruses in Gabonese children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据