4.6 Article

Human nuclear receptors (NRs) genes have prognostic significance in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02246-x

关键词

HCC; Human nuclear receptors (NRs); Risk score; Prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we found that eight optimal nuclear receptors (NRs) could serve as potential prognostic signatures for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The prognostic model based on these NRs and a nomogram incorporating multiple independent prognostic factors showed promise in predicting the long-term survival of HCC patients.
Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the world. Method We downloaded the mRNA profiles and clinical information of 371 HCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The consensus clustering analysis with the mRNA levels of 48 nuclear receptors (NRs) was performed by the ConsensusClusterPlus. The univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to predict the prognostic significance of NRs on HCC. The risk score was calculated by the prognostic model constructed based on eight optimal NRs. Then multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine whether the risk score is an independent prognostic signature. Finally, the nomogram based on multiple independent prognostic factors was used to predict the long-term survival of HCC patients. Results The prognostic model constructed based on the eight optimal NRs (NR1H3, ESR1, NR1I2, NR2C1, NR6A1, PPARD, PPARG, and VDR) could effectively predict the prognosis of HCC patients as an independent prognostic signature. Moreover, the nomogram was constructed based on multiple independent prognostic factors including risk score and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage and could better predict the long-term survival for 3- and 5-year of HCC patients. Conclusion Our results provided novel evidences that NRs could act as the potential prognostic signatures for HCC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据