4.4 Article

Emergency Evacuation Planning via the Point of View on the Relationship Between Crowd Density and Moving Speed

期刊

WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
卷 119, 期 3, 页码 2577-2602

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-021-08345-y

关键词

Emergency evacuation; Wireless sensor network; Heuristic approach; Simulated annealing (SA)

资金

  1. Intelligence Recognition Industry Service Research Center (IR-IS Research Center) from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emergency evacuation is a major concern for both industry and academia. This study utilized wireless sensor network technology to design a nonlinear mathematical model and heuristic approach for fire emergency evacuation. The model considers factors such as people distribution, safe exit locations, hazard locations, and aims to evacuate all people in the shortest time. The use of simulated annealing algorithm proved to be effective in solving the evacuation planning problem and the proposed model showed efficiency in experimental results.
Emergency evacuation is concerning to both industry and academics. This work applied the technology of a wireless sensor network to design and propose a nonlinear mathematical model and heuristic approach to fire emergency evacuation problem. The proposed model first considers basic factors including the distribution of people in each area, possible safe exit locations, possible hazard locations, rooms, open spaces, doors, and junctions. Based on these common factors and the proposed heavy smoke diffusion, the objective of the proposed model is to evacuate all people in the shortest time through the concept of load balance coming from the relationship between crowd density and moving speed. The algorithm of simulated annealing is finally applied to solve the evacuation planning problem derived from the proposed model. Experimental results verify the efficiency of the proposed model and the resulting solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据