4.7 Article

An Ensemble-Learning-Based Method for Short-Term Water Demand Forecasting

期刊

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 1757-1773

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-021-02808-4

关键词

Ensemble learning; Water demand forecasting; Short-term; Adaptive boosting algorithm

资金

  1. Scientific Research Foundation for High-level Talents of Beibu Gulf University [2019KYQD22]
  2. Guangxi Province Education Department [2021KY0438]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has found that using ensemble learning methods for short-term water demand forecasting is rarely explored in the field of water distribution systems. The proposed method involves two models for water demand forecasting, which significantly improves the accuracy and stability of predictions.
Short-term water demand forecasting has always been a hot research topic in the field of water distribution systems, and many researchers have developed a wide variety of methods based on different prediction periodicities. However, few studies have paid attention to using ensemble learning methods for short-term water demand forecasting. In this study, an ensemble-learning-based method was developed to forecast short-term water demand. The proposed method consists of two models: an equal-dimension and new-information model and an ensemble learning model. The purpose of the equal-dimension and new-information model is to update data for modelling periodically, while the ensemble learning model is used for water demand forecasting. To evaluate the forecasting performance, the proposed method was applied to a data set obtained from a real-world water distribution system and compared with the single back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model and the seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) model. The results show that the proposed method improves both the accuracy and stability of water demand prediction. The proposed method has the potential to provide a promising alternative for short-term water demand forecasting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据