4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Functional ecology of aquatic phagotrophic protists - Concepts, limitations, and perspectives

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROTISTOLOGY
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 50-74

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejop.2016.03.003

关键词

Functional response; Independent Response Model; Mixotrophy; Nonlinear dynamics; Numerical response; Protist grazing

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 20360] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Villum Fonden [00007178] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Functional ecology is a subdiscipline that aims to enable a mechanistic understanding of patterns and processes from the organismic to the ecosystem level. This paper addresses some main aspects of the process-oriented current knowledge on phagotrophic, i.e. heterotrophic and mixotrophic, protists in aquatic food webs. This is not an exhaustive review; rather, we focus on conceptual issues, in particular on the numerical and functional response of these organisms. We discuss the evolution of concepts and define parameters to evaluate predator prey dynamics ranging from Lotka-Volterra to the Independent Response Model. Since protists have extremely versatile feeding modes, we explore if there are systematic differences related to their taxonomic affiliation and life strategies. We differentiate between intrinsic factors (nutritional history, acclimatisation) and extrinsic factors (temperature, food, turbulence) affecting feeding, growth, and survival of protist populations. We briefly consider intraspecific variability of some key parameters and constraints inherent in laboratory microcosm experiments. We then upscale the significance of phagotrophic protists in food webs to the ocean level. Finally, we discuss limitations of the mechanistic understanding of protist functional ecology resulting from principal unpredictability of nonlinear dynamics. We conclude by defining open questions and identifying perspectives for future research on functional ecology of aquatic phagotrophic protists. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据