4.4 Review

Review of infrared spectroscopy techniques for the determination of internal structure in thin SiO2 films

期刊

VIBRATIONAL SPECTROSCOPY
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2021.103256

关键词

SiO2; Thin films; Porosity; FTIR; Reflection; Transmission; IRRAS; DRIFTS

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB-TR 87]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comparison of infrared spectroscopic analytical approaches was conducted to evaluate their suitability for characterizing internal structures of SiO2 thin films. The study discussed markers for porosity and/or disorder based on the analysis of the asymmetric stretching absorption band of SiO2, and investigated the effect of different substrates and techniques on the final shape of the band. The efficacy of these approaches for determining porosity in thin SiO2 films was critically evaluated.
A comparison of infrared spectroscopic analytical approaches was made in order to assess their applicability for internal structure characterization of SiO2 thin films. Markers for porosity and/or disorder based on the analysis of the asymmetric stretching absorption band of SiO2 between 900-1350 cm(-1) were discussed. The shape of this band, which shows a well-defined LO-TO splitting, depends not only on the inherent characteristics of the film under analysis but also on the particular geometry of the IR experiment and the specific surface selection rules of the substrate. Three types of SiO2 thin films with clearly defined porosity ranging from dense films to mesoporous films were investigated by transmission (at different incidence angles), direct specular reflection (at different angles), and diffuse reflection. Two different types of substrate, metallic and semiconducting, were used. The combined effect of substrate and specific technique in the final shape of the band, was discussed, and the efficacy for their applicability to the determination of porosity in thin SiO2 films was critically evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据