4.5 Article

Enhancing brush tyre model accuracy through friction measurements

期刊

VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS
卷 60, 期 6, 页码 2075-2097

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2021.1893766

关键词

Tyre model; brush model; friction; experiments

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G037388/1]
  2. Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper demonstrates how the accuracy of a simple physical-based brush-type tyre model can be enhanced by incorporating real rubber friction characteristics, allowing accurate simulation of longitudinal and lateral slip conditions over a wide range of normal loads. However, at extreme loading scenarios, the simulation accuracy deteriorates due to the significant influence of highly nonlinear deformation behaviour of the tyre that is not accounted for in the brush model formulation.
Accurate tyre models are important to ensure valid and reliable simulation of vehicle behaviour. To this purpose, the Magic Formula (MF) became the de facto standard for vehicle dynamics simulations, despite requiring many empirically derived coefficients. This paper shows how the accuracy of a simple physical-based brush-type tyre model can be enhanced to simulate tyre behaviour that closely matches MF results. To do so, the real, highly complex rubber friction characteristics are incorporated into the brush model. The friction characteristics were obtained from friction measurements with a tread rubber block. The developed model is validated against experimental tyre data obtained on a flat-track test rig and the corresponding MF model. Results show that the inclusion of friction characteristics allow accurate simulation of longitudinal and lateral slip conditions over a wide range of normal loads with the simple brush model. At extreme loading scenarios, the simulation accuracy deteriorates because of the significant influence of highly nonlinear deformation behaviour of the tyre that is not accounted for in the brush model formulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据