4.7 Review

A holistic approach to access the viability of cultured meat: A review

期刊

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 700-710

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.024

关键词

Cultured meat; Conventional meat; Food sustainability; Challenges; Market acceptance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The challenges of cultured meat technology cover various aspects from the lab Petri dish to consumer plates. The factors behind the survivability and viability of in-vitro technology have been reviewed. Additionally, the effects of technology on the economy of agriculture-based developing countries have also been revisited.
Background: Cultured meat has shown a great potential to address food sustainability and nutritional security in near future. Unlike conventional meat, the cultured meat is humane and doesn?t offend the sentiments of animal lovers, hence may satisfy the needs of a larger segment of the society. The technology promises the designer, pathogen-free, ethical and eco-friendly meat product. But there are many techno-social, economic and other challenges that has not resolved yet and play a decisive role in survivability and viability of in-vitro technology. Scope and approach: The review covers wide range of challenges that cultured meat technology is facing right from Petri dish of lab to the plate of consumer. The factors behind survivability and viability of in-vitro technology have been reviewed. Further, the effects of technology on the economy of agriculture based developing countries have also been revisited. Key findings and conclusions: Public acceptance, structural incompetency, and economy of the products are main areas which need due consideration for the successful acceptance of the cultured meat in food market. In a current scenario of Covid-19 pandemics, cultured meat may emerge as a basic need of muscle food industry. However, complete replacement of conventional meat with cultured meat may le to adverse long-term impact on agriculture-based economies of developing countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据