4.7 Review

Advanced strategies and tools to facilitate and streamline microbial adaptive laboratory evolution

期刊

TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 38-59

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.04.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0901500]
  2. National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [21627812]
  3. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2032210, 21938004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE), as a microbial engineering method mimicking natural selection to obtain desired microbes, has seen significant improvements in the past decade in terms of growth coupling, genotypic diversification, phenotypic selection, and genotype-phenotype mapping. The development of growth-coupling strategies and multiplexed automated culture platforms have expanded the applicability of ALE, while multi-omics analyses and multiplexed genetic engineering have promoted efficient knowledge mining.
Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) has served as a historic microbial engineering method that mimics natural selection to obtain desired microbes. The past decade has witnessed improvements in all aspects of ALE workflow, in terms of growth coupling, genotypic diversification, phenotypic selection, and genotype- phenotype mapping. The developing growth-coupling strategies facilitate ALE to a wider range of appealing traits. In vivo mutagenesis methods and multiplexed automated culture platforms open new gates to streamline its execution. Meanwhile, the application of multi-omics analyses and multiplexed genetic engineering promote efficient knowledge mining. This article provides a comprehensive and updated review of these advances, highlights newest significant applications, and discusses future improvements, aiming to provide a practical guide for implementation of novel, effective, and efficient ALE experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据