4.2 Article

Risk factors of BK viral hemorrhagic cystitis in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

期刊

TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tid.13601

关键词

allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; alternative donors; BK virus hemorrhagic cystitis; cyclophosphamide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to cyclophosphamide, younger age (<40), and corticosteroid therapy are potential risk factors for developing BKV-HC.
Reactivation of BK virus (BKV) can occur during intensive immunosuppression such as in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) recipients for whom a systematic PCR urine test for BKV will be positive in 50% to 100% of patients. Only 5% to 40% will develop BKV hemorrhagic cystitis (HC). Thus, BKV PCR testing is useful to confirm a diagnosis of BKV-HC but not to predict its occurrence. The aim of this retrospective study was to ascertain the risk factors of developing BKV HC, mostly in patients receiving posttransplant cyclophosphamide. The study looked at data from Grenoble Alpes University Hospital included in the national retrospective register ProMISe, administered by the Societe Francophone de Greffe de Moelle et de Therapie Cellulaire. Urine BKV PCR was performed when patients presented grade >= 2 hematuria with clinical symptoms of cystitis. BKV-HC was defined as an association of clinical symptoms of cystitis, grade >= 2 hematuria and BKV viruria > 7 log(10) copies/ml. From January 2014 to January 2018, 168 AHSCTs were considered for analysis, of which 43 (25.6%) developed BKV-HC and 44.9% of the subgroup that received posttransplant cyclophosphamide. After logistic regression, the risk factors associated with BKV-HC were reduced to posttransplantation exposure to cyclophosphamide (OR 4.25, [1.66; 10.87], P = .02), age < 40 y (OR 3.85 [1.51; 9.80], P = .005) and corticosteroid therapy (OR 3.86, [1.59; 9.36], P = .003). Exposure to cyclophosphamide, younger age (<40) and corticosteroid therapy are potential risk factors for BKV-HC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据