4.2 Review

Genome editing reagent delivery in plants

期刊

TRANSGENIC RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 321-335

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11248-021-00239-w

关键词

Genome editing; Agrobacterium; Gene gun; Nanoparticles; Viral delivery; CRISPR; Cas9; Ribonucleoprotein; Non-transgenic genome editing

资金

  1. Washington State University Agriculture Research Center Hatch grant [WNP00011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome editing has the potential to rapidly improve crops to meet the challenges of feeding the planet in changing climates. Different delivery methods for editing reagents, particularly the use of RNPs, show high efficiency but face challenges. Innovative delivery approaches are being explored for routine non-transgenic genome editing in plants.
Genome editing holds the potential for rapid crop improvement to meet the challenge of feeding the planet in a changing climate. The delivery of gene editing reagents into the plant cells has been dominated by plasmid vectors delivered using agrobacterium or particle bombardment. This approach involves the production of genetically engineered plants, which need to undergo regulatory approvals. There are various reagent delivery approaches available that have enabled the delivery of DNA-free editing reagents. They invariably involve the use of ribonucleoproteins (RNPs), especially in the case of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. The explant of choice for most of the non-DNA approaches utilizes protoplasts as the recipient explant. While the editing efficiency is high in protoplasts, the ability to regenerate individual plants from edited protoplasts remains a challenge. There are various innovative delivery approaches being utilized to perform in planta edits that can be incorporated in the germline cells or inherited via seed. With the modification and adoption of various novel approaches currently being used in animal systems, it seems likely that non-transgenic genome editing will become routine in higher plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据