4.7 Article

Influence of nickel silicides presence on hardness, elastic modulus and fracture toughness of gas-borided layer produced on Nisil-alloy

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(21)65537-1

关键词

gas boriding; hardness; elastic modulus; nanoindentation; fracture toughness

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland [0513/SBAD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-stage gas boriding process in N-2-H-2-BCl3 atmosphere was used to produce a two-zoned borided layer on Nisil-alloy. The outer layer consisted of nickel borides only, while the inner zone contained nickel silicides in addition to nickel borides. The presence of nickel silicides reduced the hardness and elastic modulus of the inner zone borided layer.
The two-stage gas boriding in N-2-H-2-BCl3 atmosphere was applied to producing a two-zoned borided layer on Nisil-alloy. The process was carried out at 910 degrees C for 2 h. The microstructure consisted of two zones differing in their phase composition. The outer layer contained only a mixture of nickel borides (Ni2B, Ni3B) only. The inner zone contained additionally nickel silicides (Ni2Si, Ni3Si) occurring together with nickel borides. The aim of this study was to determine the presence of nickel silicides on the mechanical properties of the borided layer produced on Ni-based alloy. The hardness and elastic modulus were measured using the nanoindenter with a Berkovich diamond tip under a load of 50 mN. The average values of indentation hardness (H-I) and indentation elastic modulus (E-I) obtained in the outer zone were respectively (16.32 +/- 1.03) GPa and (232 +/- 16.15) GPa. The presence of nickel silicides in the inner zone reduced the indentation hardness (6.8-12.54 GPa) and elastic modulus (111.79-153.99 GPa). The fracture toughness of the boride layers was investigated using a Vickers microindentation under a load of 0.981 N. It was confirmed that the presence of nickel silicides caused an increase in brittleness (by about 40%) of the gas-borided layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据