4.7 Review

Are standard sample measurements still needed to transfer multivariate calibration models between near-infrared spectrometers? The answer is not always

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116331

关键词

Domain adaption; Chemometrics; Transfer learning; Spectroscopy; Calibration transfer

资金

  1. Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology (BMK)
  2. Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW)
  3. Province of Upper Austria in the frame of the COMET -Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies programme
  4. COMET Center CHASE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calibration transfer (CT) involves chemometric techniques for transferring calibration models between spectrometers. Recent advancements have introduced new concepts for standard-free CT, showing potential for enhancing the sharing of calibration models between analytical devices.
Calibration transfer (CT) refers to the set of chemometric techniques used to transfer (near-infrared) calibration models between spectrometers. The requirement of traditional CT methods to measure calibration standard samples has been a challenge as such measurements are difficult in real-world applications, e.g. when the instruments are located far apart or chemically stable standard samples are not available. In recent years, major developments have taken place in the domain of CT, hence, this work provides a concise but critical review of all the main recent chemometric techniques available to perform CT. Particularly this work explains some newer concepts for standard-free CT, where the standard samples are not required to attain the CT. We conclude that CT approaches that do not rely on standard sample measurements hold promise to help making calibration models sharable between similar analytical devices and to increase the applicability of CT to real-world problems in the analytical sciences. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据